/images/scclogo.jpg
/images/tribute1.jpg

/images/video.jpg

/images/deux.jpg

/images/storage.jpg

/images/govlinks.jpg

/images/psjinfo.jpg

/images/religion.jpg

/images/services.jpg

/images/politics.jpg

/images/mylinks.jpg

/images/myblog.jpg

nomr

Barack Hussein Obama's "Unmentionables"


Paid political advertisement. Paid for and approved by Linda McKinney 6025 Keystone Ave. Port St. John, FL 32927

Paid electioneering communication paid for by Linda McKinney 6025 Keystone Ave. Port St. John, FL 32927

Paid political advertisement. Paid for and approved by Linda McKinney 6025 Keystone Ave. Port St. John, FL 32927
No candidate approved this ad.


I can't talk about this person without breaking his rules. I can't mention his middle name, Hussein (Woops!). I can't talk about his liberalism. (Woops!) I can't talk about his wife, Michelle, who said after her hubby was a serious candidate for the Dem. ticket, "Let me tell you something, for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am proud of my country..." (Woops!) I can't talk about his voting record in the Illinois Senate (or should I say his non-votes?), nor in the US Senate. (Woops!) I can't talk about his slip (funny, I didn't know he wore a slip) in saying, "my Muslim faith" and being corrected by George Stephanopolous (Woops!). I can't talk about his extreme votes on abortion, either. (Another woops!)

Take other things we're not allowed to talk about into consideration as well, for instance, who his friends are: The "Rev." Jeremiah Wright, Franklin Raines, William Ayers, (who may have ghost written Obama's first book, "Dreams From My Father"), Tony Rezko, Rashid Khalidi, Kwame Kilpatrick, George Soros, etc., etc., etc.

Today we were told that the word "socialism" is a code word for "black" and now we're not supposed to say that B. Hussein O. is a socialist. Oooohhh… Bad for us to say it, but worse for B. Hussein O. for being it! Where they come up with the idea that socialist = black, I have no idea. When was the last time that a black person's image entered your mind when the word "socialist" was mentioned? Do you think of a black person, or do you think of Hitler and Stalin? Or maybe you think of Communist China, since one leads to the other? Are we told the truth about his plans? Or does B. Hussein O. spin the things he wants to do to appear as though he's doing a good thing?

We're not allowed to talk about his ACORN ties and all of their cheating with voter registrations. Nor are we allowed to talk about his possible affair with a woman who, according to the story, "FEC Senate campaign records show she was paid a pretty penny as "Finance Director"." But, "There's no mention of Vera Baker…but Vera Baker was paid as the "Finance Director" too." So what's the truth there? We're not allowed to talk about B. Hussein O.'s position on guns.

We're not allowed to talk about his refusal to debate representatives of the Republican Jewish Coalition, citing their "continual dishonesty". (Personally, I think he has a bit of a problem with honesty himself.) When "Joe the Plumber" asked B. Hussein O. if Joe's taxes would go up if he followed his dream and bought a business, we aren't allowed to talk about Obama's answer. Nor are we allowed to talk about his stance on the space program and the jobs that would be effected by it.

I can't talk about the lawsuit a Pennsylvania attorney has filed against him trying to force him into releasing a certified copy of his birth certificate to prove that B. Hussein O. (Woops!) is actually a legally born American Citizen, which is required in order to be President of the United States (PotUS). Woops!

What? You didn't know about the lawsuit? No? How about the other one? You didn't know that B. Hussein O. has yet to produce a valid US birth certificate? You didn't know that there is a lawsuit that requests the courts to force B. Hussein O. to produce that birth certificate? Yep. Why? Because there is sufficient doubt as to whether the presidential candidate on the Democratic ticket is a legally born US citizen. Interesting? Yes. If their candidate wins, and then it turns out that the candidate does not meet the US Constitutional requirements that they:

  • Are at least 35 years of age
  • Are a naturally born citizen of the United States of America (born legally on our soil)
  • Have lived in America for no less than fourteen (14) years.

What happens then? That's what the US Constitution requires in Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5. If B. Hussein O. was not born in the United States of America1, as some say, then it is possible that he cannot legally hold the position of President.

If he's not legally allowed to be President, due to the restrictions of our US Constitution (or would you set aside the US Constitution in order to have an illegal President?), who would be our President then? Would B. Hussein O. be given special consideration because of his "overwhelming support" (even if it's a close election), or would we stick with the US Constitution upon which America was founded and would we take the Presidency away from B. Hussein O. and give it to Joe "Taxes are Patriotic" Biden? Who would be President? What would that do to our country?

Another question that comes to mind is, "Who is this person that he gets to tell everyone what we can't talk about when he's the candidate?" When the Clintons came into office, they put Chelsea off limits. Understandable: the child is not responsible for what the adults do. But putting the rest of their lives off limits, they did not do. (Nor did they ever release all of their records as most presidents have done throughout history, apparently setting a precedent for B. Hussein O.) So why do we have all of these "hands off" limitations from this candidate? Since when do we stay away from something that someone is trying to hide? If Ronald Wilson Reagan (See? I use his middle name, too.) had told the press, "Don't talk about that. That's a no-no." would the press have stayed away from that subject or dug even deeper and looked harder? They would have dug and looked and you know they would. So why is this candidate different? Why does this candidate get to tell us what we are allowed to look at, talk about, listen to?

After all, the US Constitution (there's that thing again) states that we have the right to free speech; why is this candidate so dead set upon taking that right away from us - even before he is elected? If this is what he's like without being President, what will B. Hussein O. be like as President of the United States (PotUS)? Where will our rights go, considering what the list of unmentionables is currently and considering that as PotUS, B. Hussein O. will have a lot more power than currently.

Consider this question, one that I think is extremely important: B. Hussein O. is sworn as a United States Senator, to uphold the United States Constitution. If B. Hussein O. is telling us that we cannot talk about all of this stuff regarding him, the candidate, then how can he, as a US Senator, or even as President, be supporting and upholding the US Constitution considering that the first amendment gives us the right to free speech? We can't talk about this. We can't talk about that. We can't talk about the other. And yet, according to B. Hussein O., he supports the US Constitution and he is sworn as a US Senator to do so. How, in all of these hands off issues, is he "supporting and defending" anything or anyone except himself and his own personal interests?

Consider that when you think of voting for B. Hussein O. Consider what it will look like if he becomes PotUS. If he takes away our voices now, our first amendment rights, what will he take away if he gets elected president?

And, last but not least, consider this: If B. Hussein O. is not a legal citizen of the United States of America, to whom does he owe his allegiance?





Footnotes: 1) I have seen assertions that since Sen. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone during an assignment his father took there for the US military, that he is not considered a natural born citizen. However, my military life has taught me that children born to military people who are on assignment to a foreign country are given US citizenship as though they were born on US soil due to the fact that they are over there at the behest of the US government. According to this article, (this is page two of the article), John McCain is a natural born citizen because the law states that, "Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S." and because, "Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)". This is the law. His father was serving in the US military at the time and both of his parents were US citizens. He is double qualified.


Paid political advertisement. Paid for and approved by Linda McKinney 6025 Keystone Ave. Port St. John, FL 32927

Paid electioneering communication paid for by Linda McKinney 6025 Keystone Ave. Port St. John, FL 32927



Home; Tribute; Videos; Government Links; PSJ Info; Religion; Services; Politics; Amy Tidd Rebuttal Pages; My Links; My Blog; Page Deux; Storage; Definition of True Conservative


Remember: Anyone who does not give you a wake-up call when they see you being stupid, self-destructive, or both, just plain doesn't care about you. It's those of us who do wake you up who care.


This website created by, maintained by and copyright 2008 by Linda McKinney; because Freedom isn't Free, but speech supposedly is!
Do NOT copy without prior written permission from the author.